Executing a good play at bridge is very rewarding, but it can be
hazardous to your health to brag about it. Here is a good
example:
Scoring: Matchpoints
Hand #50
Dlr
N
Vul
N-S
J943
Q853
A4
J53
KQ62
J
K10832
K76
75
2
QJ765
Q10982
A108
AK109764
9
A4
West
North
East
South
Pass
Pass
4
Pass
Pass
4NT
Pass
5
5
All Pass
BIDDING: I was sitting South with a very nice hand and
after my partner passed and East passed, I opened 4.
My hand was perhaps too
good for this bid but I wanted to make it difficult for the opponents
to enter the auction. Unfortunately, East competed with 4NT
showing both minors. After West took a preference to diamonds, my
partner ended the auction with 5. Note the vulnerability made
it easier for East-West to compete.
PLAY: West led a diamond
and I counted three possible losers, two spades and one club. I
needed to find one of the spade honors in the East hand but after she
showed length in both minors, it was very likely that West held them
both. My solution was to attempt an elimination play. I won
the diamond ace and ruffed dummy's other diamond in my hand. I
then drew trumps in one round and played ace and another club.
West won with the king and played another club which I trumped.
Now I only had to lead a trump to dummy and pass the jack of
spades. West won but was end played. He had to lead a spade
or give me a sluff and a ruff allowing me to discard my other spade
loser. I thought, "I love this game".
At dinner between sessions I casually asked my friend her result on the
hand and she said, "West led the king of spades so I was able to
discard my losing club on dummy's fourth spade and made six. What
did you do"? I took another bite and said, "Okay, what about
the next hand". I thought, "I hate this game".
Note that West erred by winning the second club. He must allow
East to win the trick and return a spade to break up the end
play. Also note that East-West's 5
contract will go down only two tricks for -300 and that's a good
sacrifice over 4.