Some players try to use science or conventions when it is better to
just bid their hand. Take a look at this one.
Scoring: Matchpoints (pairs)
Hand #12
Dlr
E
Vul
N/S
5
AKJ5
AK10854
72
KQ1073
10
Q3
J9843
864
98642
J7
Q106
AJ92
Q73
962
AK5
West
North
East
South
Pass
1
l
DBL*
2!
Pass
Pass
3
Pass
3NT
All Pass
*Negative
BIDDING: South opened
with his balanced minimum and West made a light overcall. North
didn't want to lose the heart suit so he made a negative double.
It's difficult to understand East's raise other than he just felt like
bidding. South passed and North then cue bid the opponents' suit
to ask for a stopper. South complied with 3NT.
PLAY: West led the king
of spades asking attitude from his partner. East followed with
his lowest card to deny an honor and declarer ducked. West then
shifted to a small club won by declarer. When the opponents'
diamonds divided 2-2, declarer had the rest of the tricks. Yes,
he could have taken all thirteen tricks but the holdup play ensured
eleven tricks in case East gained the lead with a diamond.
The problem is that this hand is cold for a grand slam in diamonds and
the suit was never bid. Granted you don't want to bid seven on
the strength of a 2-2 diamond break, but getting to the small diamond
slam was certainly possible. Too many players make the mistake of
making a negative double rather than bidding their suits
naturally. Note that a 3 bid by North over 2 would not be
forcing. It's usually best to just keep it simple.