When the game is scored at matchpoints (pairs), players will take many
risks to play 3NT rather than five of a minor. Here is a good
example.
Scoring: Matchpoints (Pairs)
Hand #34
Dlr
E
Vul
E/W
7
Q95
AQJ8752
83
A102
108763
K
AJ96
KJ643
2
3
Q107542
Q985
AKJ4
10964
K
West
North
East
South
Pass
1
Pass
2*
Pass
2NT
Pass
3NT
All Pass
*Natural with 10+ support points
BIDDING: Playing a
five-card major system, South opened the bidding with 1.
Sitting North and looking at my own long diamond suit, I had a couple
of options. I could jump to 3 to show a game going hand with
diamond support and shortness in the spade suit. But, I finally
decided to not give the opponents too much information and instead made
a forcing raise in diamonds. Next, South bid 2NT showing 12-13
points and stoppers in the other suits. Hoping to provide at
least seven tricks, I raised to game.
PLAY: West led a low
heart and declarer quickly wrapped up eleven tricks for +460.
Those N/S pairs who bid to a pedestrian 5,
scored only +400. It's true if West had found the ace of clubs
lead (or a spade lead with a club shift), the defenders could take the
first nine tricks. In a team event where overtricks are less
important, it would make sense to reach the minor suit game. But,
as you can see, taking chances at matchpoint scoring can pay off.
However, that +460 only earned us ten of twelve matchpoints. One
N/S pair was doubled in 5 for +550 and another pair was
doubled in 4 and made two overtricks for
+710. Matchpoints is a tough game!