There is no doubt that it takes skill to be successful at bridge but it
also helps to have a little luck. Take a look and see if this was
well played or just lucky.
Scoring: Matchpoints (Pairs)
Hand #26
Dlr
S
Vul
N/S
AKJ92
J103
A42
AQ
763
9865
J108432
1085
AQ5
KQJ3
K97
Q4
K987642
107
65
West
North
East
South
3
Pass
4NT*
Pass
5
Pass
5
Pass
5
All Pass
*Roman Keycard Blackwood
BIDDING: I was sitting
North and almost just bid slam after my partner's 3
bid. However, we had the tools so stay out of slam if his heart
suit was less than robust. My 4NT call was Keycard Blackwood
which counts the king of the agreed suit as an ace. His 5
response showed one keycard so I became a bit nervous. My 5
bid asked if he held the queen of hearts and his response denied
it. Since we were missing either the AQ or the KQ of hearts, I
was now worried. I knew slam was still possible, but decided the
odds were against us.
PLAY: West led the jack
of clubs and partner counted four possible losers: 2 hearts, 1 diamond,
and 1 club. He won the ace of clubs and played three rounds of
spades pitching a club. Finding a 3-3 spade break was only a 36%
proposition but this time it worked. Next he led the jack of
hearts from dummy, East played the queen, and the king won as West
showed out. A second heart went to the ten and ace. East
switched to the diamond king won in dummy. My partner then played
a good spade from dummy that East ruffed and South over-ruffed.
Now declarer played the deuce of hearts to dummy's trey and discarded
his diamond loser on a good spade and had 12 tricks. I knew I
should have bid the slam!
Note the importance of keeping the heart deuce for later
transportation to dummy. If East plays the ace of hearts instead
of the queen, the same end game develops. So was this a lucky
hand or was it my partner's skill? Well, a heart contract
was played at 11 other tables and no one else made 12 tricks so I have
to go with skill on this one.